Post #2900975
2026-04-18 23:21 UTC
@fuzzychef@m6n.io
Can you please cite the actual precedent?
If it's ongoing, yet-undecided cases you mean, which of the 100s of cases do you mean, what rulings have occurred that lead you to this speculation, and why?
I know you didn't mean to, but your post just feeds the FUD monsters.
Cc: @cwebber@social.coop @ossguy@fedi.copyleft.org @richardfontana@mastodon.social
@evan@cosocial.ca
Replies (1)
-
@fuzzychef@m6n.io 2026-04-19 21:44
@bkuhn@fedi.copyleft.org @cwebber@social.coop @ossguy@fedi.copyleft.org @richardfontana@mastodon.social @evan@cosocial.ca There's multiple undecided cases in Europe which show that the possibility that training violations of copyright may be very much a thing in the EU. As an example: https://www.ipcuria.eu/case?reference=C-250/25 Due to this, the EU government is debating some potentially very strong regulations on model training, including a requirement to pay all copyright holders before ingestion: https://www.osborneclarke.com/insights/eu-copyright-law-and-generative-ai-watershed-moment ...