Post #2898266
2026-03-25 09:59 UTC
@miyuru@ipv6.social @goetz@ipv6.social In 21 years, 3 customers asked for it, and a lot more demanded we turn it off for them. Zero Colo/VPS clients ever used it.
We're in the midst of some router upgrades tho, hopefully happy eyeballs is better now... perhaps I'll have better response when we start rolling it out again.
Using CGN for some access customers, could get away without it, but never sure how growth will look.
Replies (1)
-
@goetz@ipv6.social 2026-03-25 13:11
@mWare@ottawa.place @miyuru@ipv6.social Thank you for sharing this information. This is the same I hear from small ISP in DE also. Which I fully understand, as the average customer plugs in the CPE and is happy that it works. But cannot attribute issues in their daily usage with e.g, NAT444. In Europe you need to rent or buy legacy addresses which eats heavily into the profit margins of any ISP. And than they also need to buy expensive CGNAT boxes. You might be in a lucky position to have enough legacy addresses.