Post #2886331
2026-05-16 16:17 UTC
@grep@social.bawnet.io @icing@chaos.social Not really, the automation in reality still needs human (and generally experienced) humans for supervision.
Or put differently, an highend LLM tends to generate nice code reviews, but I generally only pass 20-30% of the comments on -> the rest either are bullshit (hallucinations, yes, they still do that, or overzealous conclusions because it does not have the full context …), or the LLM does not have the full architecture roadmap (so it wants to go backward in the big picture).
Replies (1)
-
@yacc143@mastodon.social 2026-05-16 16:17
That does not change the fact that it generally quickly finds a couple of “truffles” that one can “complain” about or generally improve. — But the point of AI doing complex tasks without human supervision—we are still far from that point—and that's from somebody who's mostly AI positive.