Post #2865421
2023-04-29 11:26 UTC
@nitrokey@social.nitrokey.com @chrichri@social.librem.one @martijnbraam@fosstodon.org And even if grapheneOS has them bundled but doesn't actually use them (which wouldn't make much sense but I don't have the hw),the point still stands.Complain about Qualcomm not being transparent enough, but don't talk shit about other phone makers when it's someone else who wrote that piece of software, just to scrap some sales, I'm sure you can find better ways to show your phone is better for privacy than others without resorting to articles written like that
Replies (1)
-
@chrichri@social.librem.one 2023-04-29 12:06
@martijnbraam@fosstodon.org Two things I'd like to add: * For those who might not know: @biktorgj@fosstodon.org is [this person](https://github.com/Biktorgj). They's got a reputation (not like "Paul Privacy" who didn't publish any security report I would have found through @MetaGer@suma-ev.social) * Let's not forget that @nitrokey@social.nitrokey.com does a lot for [Open Source and Hardware](https://github.com/Nitrokey). In my opinion they should just step back from this kind of marketing (and probably from android) and focus on their many achievements.