@jrenken@mastodon.sandwich.net
Post #2825842
2026-05-15 03:03 UTC
@tyler@typing.ink Unfortunate update: A Gentoo dev, who knows better than me, says the vuln is not exclusive to ptrace. So, my sysctl workaround only breaks that one public proof-of-concept exploit, not others. https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/15/3
Replies (1)
-
@galaxis@mastodon.infra.de 2026-05-15 19:38
@jrenken@mastodon.sandwich.net @tyler@typing.ink A different post in that oss-security thread backs the claim that setting yama.ptrace_scope=[23] is sufficient (for now): https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/15/10 @cadey@pony.social