Post #2822805
2024-12-16 22:16 UTC
@amyipdev@transfem.social @simontatham@hachyderm.io Mm, my own RFC from the year after 6919 is informational only and not in any protocol streams: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7168
I guess 6919 gets upgraded through association with a heavily-referenced document.
Replies (1)
-
@amyipdev@transfem.social 2024-12-16 22:16
@Two9A@hachyderm.io @simontatham@hachyderm.io oh wait, you're the developer of HTCPCP-TEA? awesome!