Post #2822800
2024-12-16 18:52 UTC
@simontatham@hachyderm.io the lack of these terms in RFC 2119 should be submitted as an erratum (to RFC 2119)
Replies (1)
-
@Two9A@hachyderm.io 2024-12-16 21:59
@amyipdev@transfem.social @simontatham@hachyderm.io Mentioned up-thread is an RFC that adds to 2119; though it doesn't define these terms it does define MUST BUT WE KNOW YOU WON'T, among others: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6919