Post #2820782
2026-03-12 13:09 UTC
@nspugh@toot.wales @solar_chase@mastodon.green that's an interesting question. But shouldn't we treat a source which is carbon neutral through a relatively short lifetime (planting to burning) as renewable?
I can see the argument against peat (a 4000 year turn around - but the crisis is now), but over a few decades I think we're probably ok with biomass.
Replies (1)
-
@nspugh@toot.wales 2026-03-12 13:19
@AngharadHafod@toot.wales @solar_chase@mastodon.green Sorry no. They are burning old growth irreplaceable, biodiversity, and carbon sink - rich, old growth B.C. Forests.