Post #2806611

@lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me wrote: > “With -s I'd more compare the behavior [of /bin/ln -s] to chmod/chown given it's non-mangled and so relative to the symlink location, you write the link target (1) into a symlink file (2).” That's a good point. Ultimately, a symlink is not really a file in the way humans think of them. (And literally is *not* a “regular” file under #POSIX).