@gedankenstuecke@scholar.social
Post #2797757
2026-04-09 22:00 UTC
@mahlzahn@nerdculture.de @uridl@mastodon.social @CoMaps@floss.social @forgejo@floss.social
Speaking as a CoMaps contributor: It's CoMaps AI Usage doc is here: https://codeberg.org/comaps/Governance/src/branch/main/AI_USAGE.md
As @mahlzahn@nerdculture.de said, it's inspired by the Forgejo document. I contributed to adapting it, and purely from my personal, very strong anti-"AI" stance I wish it was stronger.
But, it's a community effort, and ultimately the collective wanted some minor carve-outs, e.g. to leave the door ajar for allowing cherry-picks from OM under certain circumstances.
Replies (1)
-
@gedankenstuecke@scholar.social 2026-04-09 22:05
@mahlzahn@nerdculture.de @uridl@mastodon.social @CoMaps@floss.social @forgejo@floss.social The focus was on ensuring the long-term maintainability, so non-understood vibe coded contributions aren't acceptable and any code (incl. cherry-picks) needs to be read/understood by the human author and also reviewed _by humans_ who do the same. It also says that all intra- (issues, messages,…) and extra- (support, social media posts, …) project communications will be 100% human.