Post #2796025

@ids1024@mathstodon.xyz @yosh@toot.yosh.is @soph@grrl.me the point is that if the LLM's output is not copyrightable, then for that code, the GPL does not apply, because in order for a license to mean anything, _someone_ must first hold the copyright. That means that if we somehow get to a point where *all* of the code in the kernel was produced by an LLM, then anyone could ship a binary of that version of the kernel without shipping source code, and GNU/FSF wouldn't be able to do anything about it.