Post #2796008
2026-03-11 21:17 UTC
@PierricD@mastodon.green @soph@grrl.me if it was heavily vibe-coded, then the non-vibe-coded pars could be released under public domain, but the vibe-coded parts (if i understand the court rulings correctly) never belonged to anyone in the first place.
It's as if every LLM releases each "work" that it produces into public domain, at the exact microsecond that it emits that "work".
Replies (1)
-
@soph@grrl.me 2026-03-11 21:22
@JamesWidman@mastodon.social @PierricD@mastodon.green I'd contest that this is not clear, either. If it can be shown that something an LLM created has clear lineage back to a copyrighted work, then we have a clear breach of the original license. This needs to be the case to support the original license and the spirit of that license. Tools that are just doing a glorified copy/paste are violating those original licenses.