Post #2785737
2025-04-02 13:54 UTC
We test on three real datasets of counts from ISU and show more accurate predictions for one of the case studies and similar for a second. For the 3rd, the actual count was significantly lower than any previous year, and no method predicts well.
Replies (1)
-
@eschares@scholar.social 2025-04-02 13:54
We also combine the predicted distribution of counts per journal with the journal-specific Article Processing Charge (APC) to get an expected cost. This can be useful to estimate deposit accounts, for example. We used actual publisher APC lists for this, but the Butler APC dataset would be good too. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CR1MMV