Post #2772086

2026-01-17 16:01 UTC

Exactly. A lot of people seem to think that different = worse, or that not supporting the same software means it supports less software. I couldn't move to Windows right now because there is a ton of stuff I use Linux for that Windows has no alternative, or the alternatives are terrible. It works both ways.

Replies (2)

@innermachine@lemmy.world 2026-01-17 18:23

Honestly, I love having a w11 rig AND a laptop with zorin and a laptop with w10 and a old all in one with mint. Variety is the spice of life, I need a Windows laptop to tune my cars ecus. Simply not able to do it in Linux, but my Linux laptop has stuff my windows doesn't. Real ones can't just live with one os B)

Open ##2772105
@Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2026-01-17 22:35

As someone who's worked in IT for years, it's my opinion that different **is** worse. I don't really mind supporting multiple operating systems, it is a little more of a hassle, but it's far better than supporting users on systems they're not familiar with. As much of a nice idea it is to "streamline" an organization by putting every machine on the same os, in my experience it actually works better to put everyone in whatever os they're most comfortable with. For a lot of people computers are hard, period. And needing to learn new systems just to do their job is the kind of thing they have nightmares about. When it comes right down to, any modern operating system will do just fine, they're shockingly similar in the end. Plus, in many industries upwards of 80% of a user's work may be in a browser anyway. So that's where I stand, people should use whatever they want, and making people change isn't a great idea.

Open ##2772106