Post #2765863
2026-05-14 20:12 UTC
You’d have to indicate “I also support these optional bits” for this to really work, which would lead to truly massive headers.
I prefer the idea of slapping people who put up pages that cater to Chrome rather than reading and following the standards upside the head with a large dead fish. People who write faulty WYSIWYG web design software get smacked once for every bad site deployed with their help.
Replies (1)
-
@reddig33@lemmy.world 2026-05-14 20:23
There shouldn’t be any “optional bits”. Thats part of the problem. Either it’s part of a standard or it’s not. Either you meet the standard for that version number, or you don’t.