Post #2744653
2026-05-13 17:31 UTC
@grimalkina@mastodon.social I see your point, but it seems to me that the researchers did a good job of balancing the pros and cons, here. I fear that this experiment was necessary (though it will not suffice) as a wake-up call to some who currently desperately need it (including in academia!). The researchers apparently sought approval from an ethics board before going ahead with this, they specifically chose a "condition" that is not life-threatening, and the two preprints have now been withdrawn.
Replies (1)
-
@grimalkina@mastodon.social 2026-05-13 18:05
@ElenLeFoll@fediscience.org as a former IRB administrator I wouldn't have approved false medical info in the public ecosystem ever, of any kind