Post #2740695

2026-02-03 20:51 UTC

Look she’s a horrible person and I hate her as much as the next trans, but none of the news coverage on it I’ve seen so far actually has any evidence she was involved in the invitation. This kind of enthusiastic perpetuation of misinformation isn’t ok just because it aligns with our views.

Replies (3)

@UnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zone 2026-02-03 21:34

That was actually the whole joke here. She spent all this time spreading unfounded rumors about trans people and now there will be unfounded rumors about her because Epstein mentioned her in an email.

Open ##2740700
@Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2026-02-04 11:45

okay so like, why is it bad? do you have any reason other than “beause”?

Open ##2740726
@umbraroze@slrpnk.net 2026-02-04 15:10

JK Rowling has an extremely murky supply chain. By choice. A good example I heard a while back: Rana Plaza collapse in Bangladesh was one of the worst industrial accidents ever. Death toll in the thousands. One of the companies involved was Primark, which makes the official Harry Potter apparel. Was HP apparel actually made in this particular death trap? We don’t know. JK won’t discuss it. But you know what she says, she just takes one look at her bank statement and all of the worries go away. We know that much. Epstein invitation thing was just more of the same. Was JK personally involved? We don’t know. Did JK care? Evidently not.

Open ##2740732