Post #2712467
2026-03-01 16:03 UTC
@hcschuetz@mastodon.social @divbyzero@mathstodon.xyz
The statement plainly claimed the slices would have the same volume, no limits on shell thickness, no "approximately". That is demonstrably not true.
Replies (1)
-
@hcschuetz@mastodon.social 2026-03-01 19:16
@sibrosan@mastodon.social The post you were replying to was about the missing explicit requirement for conic cuts. With conic cuts one doesn't need any thickness limits or approximation as we have seen. (Or have you mixed up my remarks on "wrong" with my remarks on "negligible"?) If you are not able or not willing to distinguish between - plain wrong statements and - oversimplified and thus technically incorrect, but easily repairable statements, then we will not find a common ground. Have a nice week!