Post #2701710

2026-05-05 10:26 UTC

@schmaker In this case case ideology which the most important purpose is to convince the public that it's important to give up cars, meat and use the lowest amount of energy possible.

Replies (2)

@schmaker@schmaker.eu 2026-05-05 10:35

@Mac_CZ@mastodon.macsnet.cz Thanks for explanation. Except for meat it quite makes sense to me. What's wrong on using lowest amount of energy possible and not using cars? I managed to reduce my car trips to about 25% by switching to bike for commutes. The #bike paid for itself within one year. With previous #eScooter it took 2 years. And I'm hot as hell now! 😀 I also cannot find the problem with reducing #energy usage as it literally equals saved money. I definitely do have issue with all these #subsidies around though, that's for sure - especially when we are giving money so people could buy #cars while these money comes from people who will never be able to buy an apartment .. that's just silly...

Open ##2701711
@martin@libera.site 2026-05-05 11:10

@@Mac_CZ@mastodon.macsnet.cz A aby to bylo vtipnější - stavbou OZE zaručujeme další závislost na fosilních zdrojích, byť o něco menší, ale finančně prakticky stejnou, nebo i vyšší(genitální taktika vypnout uhelné elektrárny a místo nic postavit nové plynové). @Schmaker Jinak jsme to tu už řešili: #^https://libera.site/display/b02bc4e6-f46a-4432-9028-0815dc34990b Někde jsem ještě házel výpočet potřebné kapacity baterek pro týdenní dunkelflaute, ale nevím, jestli tady, nemůžu to teď dohledat. Náklady astronomické. Zcela mimo realitu. A byly by to náklady na OZE.

Open ##2701716