Elektrine lite

← Feed

@Geri@veganism.social

2026-09-29 09:30 UTC

I find it extraordinary that the Labour Party is discussing reducing the money the pensioners should rightly have after working hard all their lives when the top 5% of the country own 65% of our nation's wealth. As best as I understood, the Labour Party was set up to look after the workers not protect the privileged few.

Replies (11)

  • @Geri@veganism.social i feel like there is a reasonable argument to be made that the labour movement and the labour party have never had their interests align really. Even going back to the second labour government in the 1930s they squashed the miners strikes in favour of coal barons. Edit, my bad, was the second

    Open ##4988073

  • @adipoeserPursch@troet.cafe 2026-09-29 09:33

    @Geri@veganism.social This seems to be a f***ing shitty "trend" in many countries. 😤

    Open ##4988074

  • @riggbeck@mastodon.social 2026-09-29 09:42

    @Geri@veganism.social Especially since our pension rate is one of the lowest in Europe.

    Open ##4988075

  • @beakerman@toot.wales 2026-09-29 10:01

    @Geri@veganism.social The Labour party lost its way under Kinnock when it ditched clause 4 and has never recovered

    Open ##4988077

  • @Walrus@toot.wales 2026-09-29 10:43

    @Geri@veganism.social Wasn't that before Tory Blair? Oh, hang on... I may mean Harold Wilson.

    Open ##4988078

  • @Geri@veganism.social that was old labour, not new labour, that works for the wealthy and for israel

    Open ##4988079

  • @Geri@veganism.social "was" is doing all of the heavy lifting in that last sentence of yours.

    Open ##4988082

  • @woo@fosstodon.org 2026-09-29 11:26

    @Geri@veganism.social I started receiving my state pension last year but I don't think I could live on it. Any politician trying to save money this way should try and 'show their workings', like 30p Lee didn't!

    Open ##4988084

  • @PaulNickson@mastodon.social 2026-09-29 11:55

    @Geri@veganism.social All part of the attitude that (as Pritti Patel said) if you’re ‘economically’ inactive’ you are of no (further) use to society.

    Open ##4988085

  • @Shamhatt@mastodon.social 2026-09-29 12:24

    @Geri@veganism.social Main difference between Starmer and Burnham is that the latter is a natural born conman. He busted in with such overwhelming support that he really didn't need to keep Mahmood and Streeting, yet they're still there (lurking in the shadows lest they begin to stink too much). Miliband is being played and won't be given an opportunity to move a single inch beyond that publicity stunt. Healy is an opportunistic hyena who will sell us as packets of Soylent Green whithout a second thought.

    Open ##4988086

  • @Lazarou@mastodon.social 2026-09-29 15:09

    @Geri@veganism.social anything but 'Tax The Rich' isn't it? Now they're coming after Pensioners rather than do a Wealth Tax.

    Open ##4988087