Post #2664779
2025-04-27 13:37 UTC
@ErikJonker@mastodon.social thank you for developing! as i said in another post here, i don't have a problem with individuals using llm's the way that makes sence to them and brings them joy.
now, this might seem agressive, but please bear with me: while elaborating on your use of llm's, you have not answered my question, or rather _your own question_ to the topic starter: where do _you_ draw the line between the acceptable and unacceptable use of llm for programming?
Replies (1)
-
@ErikJonker@mastodon.social 2025-04-27 14:32
@tivasyk@mycrowd.ca ...it's unacceptable if checks & balances are no in a place, no LLM output can be trusted. I also would employ it in supporting roles, checking for bugs, suggesting improvements etc, NOT for writing the main code for large systems/processes in business or government.