Post #2631456
2026-04-15 22:17 UTC
@emorydunn@mastodon.tinycart.club That seems...reasonable(?)...based on my testing with ~200k item library. The bulk of the time will be from the ML face/tagging. Getting through EXIF scanning should be much faster.
Is that way more time than you expected?
(Also, that time estimate is new and I don't have much data yet on how accurate it is.)
Replies (1)
-
@emorydunn@mastodon.tinycart.club 2026-04-15 22:47
@tylerhall@social.lol I'm not sure what I'd expect, faster would be nicer, but there's only so much you can do when reading and processing tens of thousands of files.