Post #2616790

2026-05-07 08:49 UTC

@patrickbrosset@mas.to The feedback various implementors are collecting seems quite opaque to me. Any signal coming out of it doesn't seem all that traceable and so people trust it less. I guess https://github.com/web-platform-dx/developer-signals is the more open approach to this? Maybe OT participants could give some of their feedback there? (This would of course require a web-feature ID for OT features, though).

Replies (2)

@patrickbrosset@mas.to 2026-05-07 11:43

@floscholz@front-end.social that's a good idea, trying to tie back OT feedback to WebDX feature IDs. Generally, the feedback for OTs exists as issues on various spec or explainer repos. For example, the OT (https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/origin-trials/trials/ff216fe5-9eb9-4acb-aace-2f6a8789b95c) links to https://github.com/WICG/PEPC/issues/62 for feedback. But that's specific to each OT.

Open ##2616791
@patrickbrosset@mas.to 2026-05-07 11:44

@floscholz@front-end.social worth noting too, vendors aren't obliged to share this feedback. It usually (always?) happens in the open, on github repos or bug trackers, but a vendor could very well run an OT to gather private feedback from early testing partners, via an email address, or whatever.

Open ##2616792