Post #2605995
2022-12-14 03:03 UTC
@zalcarik@mastodon.social if you were to paint a dragon, you might not have the same experience, but you could have in mind a mental model of how a dragon physically moves, of its skeleton and muscles and mind, of the physics of flight, and beyond that of the context of the picture, the story in which the dragon lives, and who else lives there. I’ve never heard of any AI coming anywhere near that kind of creative process
Replies (1)
-
@ShadSterling@mastodon.social 2022-12-14 03:03
@zalcarik@mastodon.social All these AIs can work with is the training data. Anything recognizable in their output is a result of deriving it from the training data and nothing else. And you can see that in the parts of the images that don’t make sense. We could be creating these as tools for artists, to expand art, figuring out how to share credit (and payments) between the creators of the training images and the prompt writers, treating them like the collaborations they are, but that’s not what we’re doing