Post #2605992
2022-12-13 22:02 UTC
@ShadSterling@mastodon.social But that's pretty on par with what human artists need to do. Consider not the scenic photo spot, but instead something like a dragon--there's no real-world example an AI or human could draw from, they need to make reference to existing art.
I think that's all still mostly tangential to the issue of authorship and creative/artistic input. The AI/camera are backboxes, that take inputs and allow for creative input in turning those inputs to outputs.
Replies (1)
-
@ShadSterling@mastodon.social 2022-12-14 03:03
@zalcarik@mastodon.social it’s more elaborate than my analogy, but that doesn’t make it not analogous; the best introview I’ve seen is https://youtu.be/1CIpzeNxIhU . There’s no experience, no context, no story, no mental model of growth or movement or weather, just numerical calculation with a large number of tuning parameters set by the prompt.