Post #2605910
2022-12-12 20:10 UTC
@GraysonBell@writing.exchange @yacc143@mastodon.social @Manigarm@mastodon.social
You answered your own question - it would be more work. It would also have a smaller sample size, so AI art would not be as variable.
Replies (2)
-
@GraysonBell@writing.exchange 2022-12-12 20:18
@sinboy@wandering.shop @yacc143@mastodon.social @Manigarm@mastodon.social I did some digging, and the Smithsonian released 2.8 million pieces of art to the public domain in a database anyone can access. The existence of such databases makes it much less work. https://www.artdex.com/what-is-public-domain-art-2/
-
@yacc143@mastodon.social 2022-12-13 08:18
@sinboy@wandering.shop @GraysonBell@writing.exchange @Manigarm@mastodon.social Dramatically more work for a much more limited, one sided training data. Plus conceding the precedent without even losing in court.