Post #2598051
2025-11-02 04:51 UTC
@lysander07@sigmoid.social @fizise@sigmoid.social @enorouzi@sigmoid.social @joerg@sigmoid.social @NFDI4Chem@nfdi.social @DiTraRe@social.kit.edu interesting read!
Some suggestions for the references:
missing DOI: Ref1, Ref2, Ref14, Ref15
malformed DOI: Ref4
malformed arXiv ID: Ref4, Ref16, Ref17, Ref21
year: Ref21
missing authors: Ref23
Replies (1)
-
@egonw@social.edu.nl 2025-11-02 04:56
@lysander07@sigmoid.social @fizise@sigmoid.social @enorouzi@sigmoid.social @joerg@sigmoid.social @NFDI4Chem@nfdi.social @DiTraRe@social.kit.edu I miss comparison with past efforts of creating RDF knowledge bases, which has a quite extensive history, e.g. see https://egonw.github.io/acsrdf2010/ And I see integration with PubChemRDF, which I like. ChemSpider does not have RDF. But why not add Wikidata? https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-53n0w