Post #2595726
2026-05-13 16:56 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social 2026-05-13 17:10
@db0@hachyderm.io You(r mod) fed a user's post history to an LLM in the course of a moderation action. That happened, and it's not disinfo to say so. Your new statement indicates that you're against LLM use in moderation. That's good, and I certainly hope that this incident has not created a permission structure for other instances to follow suit. If it does happen again, it won't be anarchists scrutinizing zionist trolls. We'll be the ones getting fed to the surveillance machine. The concern has been justified @cyno@novo-atlantis.null.media @violetmadder@kolektiva.social
-
@helge@mas.to 2026-05-13 18:30
@db0@hachyderm.io @ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social @cyno@novo-atlantis.null.media @violetmadder@kolektiva.social As an onlooker, the "we owned" part is probably what is the disconnect. When a moderator is using LLM in a moderation *context* and it is called an *experiment* by other moderators, everyone else considers that to be moderators using LLM when moderating. Holding on to the notion that it's not, doesn't come off as owning the mistake. It would help to admit it first, then move the conversation on.