Post #2595720
2026-05-13 16:16 UTC
@ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social @cyno@novo-atlantis.null.media @violetmadder@kolektiva.social No, they did NOT use it for moderation.The moderation decision had already been taken. It was NOT used to confirm that decision either. It was an experiment to see if the LLM summary would be a good way to enhance the modlogs.
Replies (2)
-
@ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social 2026-05-13 16:24
@db0@hachyderm.io That's hair-splitting. But question for you. Since you're feeding user post histories into it, have you audited Qwen's network activity? And is the server it sits on itself defended from *other* AI scrapers? @cyno@novo-atlantis.null.media @violetmadder@kolektiva.social
-
@monokeros@tech.lgbt 2026-05-13 16:27
@db0@hachyderm.io @ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social @cyno@novo-atlantis.null.media @violetmadder@kolektiva.social Looking at AI output shapes cognition. This is just as bad as journalists who use AI for "research notes" or whatever. Sorry this is indefensible