Post #2595716
2026-05-13 09:17 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social 2026-05-13 15:55
@db0@hachyderm.io I know little about the childish scene drama on the threadiverse, but I can tell you that the response to this on microblog-fedi has nothing to do with "discrediting anarchist instances", not least since I am an anarchist tooting to you from another anarchist instance. On the contrary, it's *because* I'm an anarchist that I saw a need to take responsibility and denounce the slop-based moderation tactics you're implementing over there in the name of anarchism. As I will repeat from another post in this thread, the only conversation anarchists should be having about "AI" is how to most effectively sabotage and destroy it. Your logs reference a currently active GPT model. This was dismissed in your lemmy comments as "funny". Why is that funny? It's not. It's not remotely funny that your logs indicate you're sending user post histories to OpenAI. Whether it's true or just "funny", it's utterly negligent moderation practice. The fig leaf your clique hides behind for justifying your use of "AI" in moderation is that your models are "local" and "open". Open what? Source? Weight? Neither really? Whatever, but let's unpack the "local" excuse. The notion of "local models" among the soft-AI apologists is that an individual is downloading a model and running it on their own machine at home. You guys calling your serverside "ideology analyzer" local will be cold comfort to the users whose post history you've extracted and fed into it. In fact, from their perspective, there's little difference at all - their accounts were hosted on different instances than yours. Why is it less violating to them if dbzer0 is doing it as opposed to OpenAI? You're becoming the extractive techbros that all of this was supposed to provide an alternative to. As I noted above, this is copthink. You're doing exactly what cops do - sourcing this exact kind of tech and weaponizing it against "the enemy" on ideological patrol. Anarchism doesn't need its own version of Palantir. Finally, I'm aware the user account behind all of this is a zionist troll. I know that because I spend 30 seconds examining the user posts, exactly what every fedi mod does when confronted with a report. Why do you even need all of this computationally expensive "ideology analysis" anarcho-solutionism when it's clearly obvious from a quick glance the account is reactionary? Block them from your instance and move on, no "horde" of energy-sucking LLMs required @cyno@novo-atlantis.null.media @violetmadder@kolektiva.social
-
@cyno@novo-atlantis.null.media 2026-05-13 15:56
@db0@hachyderm.io So can you confirm that you do not use AI moderation tools to judge people’s ideology as alleged in this article? Only the anti-CSAM stuff https://join.piefed.social/2026/05/04/ai-assisted-moderation-in-the-fediverse-is-happening-now-what/ sorry, i remember the sidebar of the lemmy saying ‘be an anarchist, make AI Art’ which seemed very ideologically confused, I assumed ancap, gave the clear impression of some corpo entryist project. i read this document, which doesn’t reflect a deep engagement with anarchist ethics, it all feels very ‘hello fellow kids’ it’s kinda weird how on the one hand you seem to have no ideological preferences, while having a very very specific line on AI which is at odds with what most anarchists think on the question. https://wiki.dbzer0.com/divisions-by-zero/the-anarchist-code-of-conduct/#wiki-toc-licensing-of-this-document until microblogging outrage and rampant disinfo made Nivenly capitulate and throw Haidra under the bus. so you tried to get money but didn’t get it, and you lament that and blame microbloggers for it. That’s much less ‘misinfo’ than not getting all the details correct. @ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social @violetmadder@kolektiva.social