Post #2584041
2026-05-15 22:24 UTC
@WandererUber@poa.st @lain@lain.com Nah I mean like I had it evaluate something on a whim as I wanted to see what the statistical text machine would say about my work which I painstakingly put into a meter (I'm fammiliar with how it should sound since as a sikh I've been raised on that kind of poetey)
Its through it thay Iearned that it actually had a conplex set of rules (I did verify it according to wikipedia) and it was mostly correct, some word choice changes tn suggested felt off but the actual analysis of the meter was quite correct
Replies (1)
-
@meeper@netzsphaere.xyz 2026-05-15 22:30
@WandererUber@poa.st @lain@lain.com and tbh there wasn't that much to verify, llms (as shown by their capability of being useful in the routine theorem proving kind of math) are not too bad at that kind analysis stuff when its clear and defined, which due to the particulars in this case is highly formulaic