Post #2547544
2026-05-03 15:43 UTC
@philipncohen@mastodon.social Unless the researcher validates this, which is imo more unlikely than likely if one does a prompt-based analysis in the first place, the code is worth nothing. Plus the findings may be non-reproducible by the original researcher when the LLM is altered, which happens regularly, I think. With mandatory code sharing, this would be relatively easy to detect once a third party tries to verify the findings.
Regardless, would be interesting to know why ASA has no policies adopted. 4/
Replies (1)
-
@druedin@sciences.social 2026-05-04 16:03
@ingorohlfing@mastodon.social @philipncohen@mastodon.social Wasn't this perhaps an "easy" target? These associations have been tested many times, so I guess someone working on these questions could have predicted these results, too?