Post #2539334
2026-05-04 00:27 UTC
@julieofthespirits@kolektiva.social Turing seems to consider that the machine being too good at math would give it away.
"The game may perhaps be criticised on the ground that the odds are weighted too heavily against the machine. If the man were to try and pretend to be the machine he would clearly make a very poor showing. He would be given away at once by slowness and inaccuracy in arithmetic. May not machines carry out something which ought to be described as thinking but which is very different from what a man does? This objection is a very strong one, but at least we can say that if, nevertheless, a machine can be constructed to play the imitation game satisfactorily, we need not be troubled by this objection."
https://www.csee.umbc.edu/courses/471/papers/turing.pdf
Replies (1)
-
@foolishowl@social.coop 2026-05-04 00:32
@julieofthespirits@kolektiva.social Actually, looking at Turing's argument, he's not arguing that a computer would be self-aware or conscious, but only that you could define "thinking" to include what a computer does, which seems like a much more limited claim than is usually associated with the Turing Test.