Post #2521893
2024-10-16 13:57 UTC
@deevybee@mastodon.social Thanks for this! So I thought Scientific Reports was just a PLOS One clone but more expensive to get a nature url, but it turns out to also be less rigorous 😠.
Replies (2)
-
@brembs@mastodon.social 2024-10-16 14:36
@marcrr@ecoevo.social @deevybee@mastodon.social My thoughts exactly! 😆
-
@hye@glammr.us 2024-10-16 17:11
@marcrr@ecoevo.social @deevybee@mastodon.social I dunno, seems like a profitable business decision to copy the model, but excise the slow, unreliable part (peer review).