Post #2516085
2026-04-17 16:00 UTC
Replies (1)
-
@nilesjohnson@mathstodon.xyz 2026-04-17 16:00
With even more background, I can give an even easier statement of our main theorem, and finally an explanation of how it's proved. The required background involves a cute little category that we call the *Super Integers*. This is a symmetric monoidal category, Z, whose objects are the integers, and where each object has two automorphisms called "odd" and "even" or denoted ±1; that's the "super" part. There are no morphisms between non-equal objects. [Aside: yes, this name is too hip, but I've come to terms with it.] You can think of the Super Integers like the integers with "virtual permutations": it's symmetric monoidal, so you can make sums and permute summands, but each permutation is characterized only by its *sign*. (These generating objects could also be denoted ±1, but then I get confused by having the same notation for objects and morphisms, so I'll avoid that here!!) (6/9)