Post #2509454

I miss the 4:3 aspect ratio.  It is mathematically way more efficient than anything that's common now.  Unlike the aspect ratios that replaced it, you can literally do this one in your head: 3^2 = 9 4^2 = 16 9+16 = 25 5^2 is also 25, as expected. So a rectangle with sides 3 and 4 has a diagonal of 5.  If you try this with 16:9, 16:10, or probably any of the others (I'm assuming there are some I've never seen, whether they were ever common or not), you will not get a whole number. #Enshittification