Post #2503728
2026-05-13 18:30 UTC
Replies (8)
-
@mensrea@freeradical.zone 2026-05-13 18:42
@b0rk@social.jvns.ca ah yes. the zen of refactoring
-
@ednl@mastodon.social 2026-05-13 18:43
@b0rk@social.jvns.ca Figuring out how to best organise the classes hierarchy, for instance? Yeah, I always found that fun work. Just like designing the perfect database scheme.
-
@Jayenkai@mastodon.social 2026-05-13 19:07
@b0rk@social.jvns.ca It seems much more manageable, nowadays. Either that or I just didn't have a clue what I was doing with it, the last time I tried. ... .... .. probably the latter, if I'm honest!
-
@dago@river.group.lt 2026-05-13 19:52
@b0rk@social.jvns.ca is that just for fun, or is there philosophical reason why no Tailwind? :D I kinda like it, because naming elements is paaaaaaaaaaain, even with BEM :D
-
@mwop@phpc.social 2026-05-13 20:21
@b0rk@social.jvns.ca I did that a couple years ago, and learned sooooo much! And brought my stylesheet and page sizes down a TON in the process as well.
-
@ballyn@infosec.exchange 2026-05-13 20:58
@b0rk@social.jvns.ca sounds like purgatory tbh
-
@evana@hachyderm.io 2026-05-13 21:51
@b0rk@social.jvns.ca I'd love to read a summary of your lessons. I'm also a "prefer fewer tools" type, and I'd like to understand what the problems are as you scale up.
-
@pierstoval@mastodon.social 2026-05-14 06:48
@b0rk@social.jvns.ca with component-based frontend tools, it's now easy to scope css for a single component with basic CSS classes, and just analyse potential double usage of certain rules in order to create one additional common CSS stylesheet. Been doing that for a while without tailwind and it's perfect (and I'm more of a Bootstrap old timer 🤣)