@SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Post #2501596
2026-05-13 00:26 UTC
The problem here, I think, is that if ‘justified true beliefs’ aren’t ‘knowledge’ then nothing is. Which is a perfectly valid stance, but not a particularly useful one.
Also, one might argue that the belief in question wasn’t properly justified.
Replies (1)
-
@groet@feddit.org 2026-05-14 00:45
Yeah you’d be justified in questioning any background just from how easy and common it is to use them. However, if after after some time (and the person moving around a bit), you see no signs of it being a fake background (like cut of hair or such), you would then be justified in assuming it is real.