Post #2489326

2026-04-23 17:13 UTC

@lumi@snug.moe Yeah, currently that can only do webpages, and also on a per-domain basis, if I understood correctly. But at least for web content independent of the type, this could at least help identify quality content. Do you have an idea how one could extend this to stuff outside just webpages? Would be interested to hear your thoughts.

Replies (1)

@lumi@snug.moe 2026-04-23 17:19

@Wolkensteine@mastodon.wolkenheim.eu well, the point here is a web of trust. human.json could be extended to vouch that nothing in the site was made with genai; not the code, not the artwork, not the translations, nothing at all for code this could be difficult in the short term, we need to inform non-programmers about how genai is being used in code and how they can find ways to publish where they can be reasonably certain the project is against genai but i think a human.json like that would be fine for websites now, if we are talking about sites where content is hosted but the people on the site are not the ones running the site, it gets more thorny i do think we should have code forges, art websites, etc that completely ban genai in their ToS and vouch for things that way in case of code, we also could have a file like VALUES.md which contains the values of the project. i have been thinking about this for a while now, and when i have the spoons will be drafting templates for it, such that projects can easily get a policy with a full ban on genai (as well as being inclusive, anti-capitalist, and all the other good stuff)

Open ##2489327