Post #2477828
2026-04-09 10:42 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@celesteh@post.lurk.org 2026-04-16 18:25
Reviving this thread for two reasons: 1. I forgot to include citations! 2. I think it's maybe my unfair gloss to suggest that Jack Halberstam might endorse forgetting as a way of disrupting intergenerational trauma. Indeed, in Wellerstein's post, he identifies two kinds of knowledge: book learning and tacit knowledge. Book learning are the plans for how to make a rocket. Tacit knowledge is having the skills to do the precision welding on the fuel lines. You need both of these to run the nuclear programme. This is the required _technical_ knowledge. But, I will argue, it's not the only kind of knowledges and not the only kind needed to run a nuclear programme. In order to run a nuclear programme, especially one with the ability to literally kill everyone, you need to _want_ to run such a programme. It's not a binary decision to be able to end the world, but thousands or millions of smaller decisions about how and _why_ to build such a massive, sprawling system. The 'why' is another form of transmitted knowledge. Why on earth did people in the 1950s decide that they wanted to run the world as a suicide pact? This cultural mindset, which persisted until at least the 1980s was engendered in people, an invisible form of knowledge transfer.
-
@prinlu@0x.trans.fail 2026-04-09 17:56
@celesteh@post.lurk.org very interesting thread, thank you 💜