Post #2458896
2026-05-12 16:21 UTC
Replies (6)
-
@davva23@kolektiva.social 2026-05-12 19:30
@FolksVelo@mas.to Nice! Do you have a link to that?
-
@Quenti@framapiaf.org 2026-05-13 06:59
@FolksVelo@mas.to Soit tu mets le nom de toutes les villes soit aucun xD
-
@orva@social.orva.fi 2026-05-13 07:00
@FolksVelo@mas.to To make the change even more concrete: in Helsinki we had first year ever without pedestrian traffic fatalities after that change.
-
@ratsnakegames@mastodon.social 2026-05-13 07:12
@FolksVelo@mas.to most of these are impressive but 2.5dB of volume difference are literally not noticeable to most humans, to the point that including it in this infographic feels misleading
-
@antopatriarca@mathstodon.xyz 2026-05-13 09:01
@FolksVelo@mas.to I think the time loss is misleading as it clearly assumes the speed in many streets is already around 30 or lower because of traffic or other circumstances. In situations of no traffic the difference in time is much bigger (65%) and these are the situations where the change is going to affect the drivers the most. I mostly walk around the city and hate cars, but there are few things more irritating than going very slow in a street with no one around and you are late. And at these velocities it makes a quite big difference contrary the infographic claims.
-
@ppulfer@mastodon.ie 2026-05-16 07:04
@FolksVelo@mas.to, a noble "idea" and can be implemented in residential areas but I'm cities where you need to commute and get goods and services it becomes a productivity killer and increases cost of living exponentially.