Post #2458734
2026-05-12 19:38 UTC
@anonymouspl@expressional.social @u0421793@toot.pikopublish.ing @cabel@social.panic.com @Landa@graz.social @futurebird@sauropods.win @StarkRG@myside-yourside.net
Sorry, yeah, my bad. I was indeed talking about LMs, without the "Language", just "Large Models". The extra L accidentally slipped in bc of habit
Edit: Most people aren't aware or know to distinguish between LLMs and LMs either, so that's why I assumed that's what Ian was talking about too
Replies (1)
-
@u0421793@toot.pikopublish.ing 2026-05-12 21:53
@soc@club.endormis.cat @futurebird@sauropods.win @StarkRG@myside-yourside.net @Landa@graz.social @cabel@social.panic.com @anonymouspl@expressional.social Also, don’t fall into the trap of thinking that non-human language is just a bunch of other different sounds made by animals. I anticipate much more advanced ways of capturing, recognising and digitising language of not-humans, which might end up placing more emphasis on not-sounds, eg stance, position relative to things, timing, etc. This would still go into a tokenisation funnel the same way that a novel verbal language would be, for the trainings.