Post #2447684
2026-05-08 21:30 UTC
@stiiin@infosec.space to be honest, browsers could just integrate their own caching resolvers. Browsers do all kinds of crazy stuff (DRM, WebRTC, WASM, …), but when it comes to DNS, they are all like "oh no, how can i do this?"
But I'm with you: that extension would be killer argument.
@dalias@hachyderm.io @SRAZKVT@tech.lgbt
Replies (2)
-
@pooserville@dice.camp 2026-05-08 22:30
@i@toot.pouyan.net @dalias@hachyderm.io @stiiin@infosec.space @SRAZKVT@tech.lgbt The idea of having to troubleshoot a client's web browser's integrated DNS resolver makes me want to run away and live in a hole in the ground. (But I have a lot of days like that.)
-
@freci@piaille.fr 2026-05-08 23:17
@i@toot.pouyan.net @dalias@hachyderm.io @stiiin@infosec.space @SRAZKVT@tech.lgbt see also: DNS SRV for HTTP, blocked by Google for so long because it adds a roundtrip and they prefer having a reverse proxy instead because they can