Post #244546
2026-02-08 15:38 UTC
Replies (19)
-
@worhui@lemmy.world 2026-02-08 16:17
This an an absolutely exceptional claim that would put the company decades beyond any tech I have seen. They are claiming remote control of a complicated animal in flight. They also claim it is without training and over distances impossible for a bird as small as a pigeon to carry radio gear. This is not believable without any evidence.
-
@Soulphite@reddthat.com 2026-02-08 15:43
Those guys at Birds Aren't Real are having a "told you so!" moment right now.
-
@voidsignal@lemmy.world 2026-02-08 17:01
Then tomorrow they'll invent teleportation during lunch break. Russia is such an advanced state, and defintely not shithole running out a cash propaganda machine governed by a stupid afraid-of-death human stain
-
@Etterra@discuss.online 2026-02-09 07:32
I can't wait until news comes out about cats or hawks killing and eating them.
-
@shyguyblue@lemmy.world 2026-02-08 15:51
Dudes' been playing Fallout show...
-
@Ninjascubarex@lemmy.zip 2026-02-08 16:20
Same company that did the Pythia rat experiment https://neiry.ru/analytica/tpost/p1o2t7kbt1-predstavlyaem-krisu-kotoraya-umnee-bolsh
-
@MrFappy@lemmy.world 2026-02-08 16:54
This will lead to unintended consequences of Russian citizens killing any bird they see, which will mirror the Chinese famine from years ago where they did the same, but that led to an increase of crop killing insects which led to widespread famine.
-
@SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2026-02-10 13:08
"first", LOL...wake up sheeple, birds aren't real.
-
@yesman@lemmy.world 2026-02-08 18:31

-
@bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 2026-02-08 16:20
I would like to go back to the times when I could easily tell a joke from reality. To go, please.
-
@Sims@lemmy.ml 2026-02-09 00:56
Ha ha, I can't believe anyone would still peddle this dumb propaganda nonsense :-) Come on OP, can we move on from that embarrassing con-job already ?
-
@DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 2026-02-09 04:42
Stop these bots. Show me something concrete. No actual showcases or even knowledge behind this means its just words.
-
@rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 2026-02-08 16:50
Bull - and what's more - shit
-
@MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 2026-02-08 22:25
No.
-
@Bazell@lemmy.zip 2026-02-08 18:10
Yeah, yeah. Most likely just a wireless camera glued to a bird.
-
@wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 2026-02-08 17:01
Russians? LOL. The best they can do is to fucking eat the poor little bird, as their economy is fucked and they are stupid enough to not understand why. Stop believing into miracles. Russia is a shit hole not much better to Nigeria. (Sorry Nigeria, I’m sure you’re much better than that, I just have no good example to compare to.)
-
@OptimusPrimeDownfall@discuss.tchncs.de 2026-02-08 17:01
If it's actually true and not the usual Russian bullshit they can only back up with bots.
-
@OptimusPrimeDownfall@discuss.tchncs.de 2026-02-10 07:30
While it as has nothing directly to do with building a tank, the fact that russia can't design and build a tank that doesn't play turret toss when it gets hit with a shell or break down in the middle of a parade DOES have a lot in common with this - it's called brain drain. Literally all of the smartest young people left Russia because the pay was bad and the prospects for living were better I'm the west. You say thag everyone of consequence involved in designing military equipment in russia has better knowledge than Germany? Due to what experience, getting their World War 2 era tanks pulled out of the mud by Ukrainian tractors? They can't even build more than a handful of the newest tank and then never send them into war. They haven't fielded new equipment eccept inaccurate artillery shells. You're wanting to claim a country that experienced that amount of brain drain is can do cutting edge brain surgery?? What, did they lobotomize you first?
-
@OptimusPrimeDownfall@discuss.tchncs.de 2026-02-11 16:06
> Their automatic loading system is optimized for fire rates, but not safety. The autoloader can fire every 10 seconds. An Abrams crew can fire.. Every 4. NATO tanks are faster. More Russian tanks also only matter if they ARE comparable. But they're not. For example, the "new engine" is an old Nazi design that was, and is still, famous for breaking down. They use thermal sights! Left over from the French. Russians die AND they're slower. All glory to the motherland. > There was no brain drain then You should look up what brain drain means. > Unfortunately no. Fortunately for them yes? At least they're not dying in ukraine with sunflower seeds in their pockets. > Russians have passively understood by now about modern warfare, it's all about information, planning, coordination Right!! That's why the invasion of ukraine was so quick! Plan for three days, the planning and coordination they passively understand means it's... Still going. 4 years later. > Tanks have no place in that. It's a darn good thing, too, since Russia has only built what, 30 T14s since 2015? Can't rely on something you can't build! And you're right. Tanks have no place in modern warfare. That's why Russia saber rattles so hard when western nations give or sell tanks to Ukraine, because they're just so useless. > I think oil money that buys western components for weapons can buy expertise in areas of interest. True!! If only they would stop putting that foreigner expertise straight onto the front lines. What a waste.