Post #2443070

@tdpauw@mastodon.social Hmm, if you frame it how you did it now (this article made my client think X, which is understandable. Unfortunately the facts are/my opinion_observation is Y) that seems like a sensible approach to me. As long as you're not saying "how could one ever believe AI would solve this?!" it's not shaming but proving a point and_or fact. You cannot prevent the author from _hypothetically_ feeling insulted by not being right. You can just be kind and empathetic.