Post #2433644
2024-03-31 10:39 UTC
@mattjhodgkinson@scicomm.xyz @mike@sauropods.win @villavelius@mastodon.online @Luke_Drury@mastodon.dias.ie @johannes_lehmann@fediscience.org
I don't see how Gates have jumped any gun. As we try to emphasize in the post, Gates are just implementing a growing consensus that covers not only a large number of scholalry organizations, but also funders and even science minsters.
Replies (1)
-
@brembs@mastodon.social 2024-03-31 10:40
@mattjhodgkinson@scicomm.xyz @mike@sauropods.win @villavelius@mastodon.online @Luke_Drury@mastodon.dias.ie @johannes_lehmann@fediscience.org Every organization is also stating clearly the positive vision, e.g.: "interoperable, not-for-profit infrastructures for publishing based on open source software and open standards, in order to avoid the lock-in of services as well as proprietary systems" We also already have sustainable alternatives, as e.g., COAR has also clearly stated: https://www.coar-repositories.org/news-updates/coar-welcomes-the-council-of-eu-conclusions-on-high-quality-transparent-open-trustworthy-and-equitable-scholarly-publishing/