@poundquerydotinfo@forum.virctuary.com
Post #2433249
2026-03-23 18:10 UTC
@rfc1036@hostux.social Also, contradicting your entire thesis that this is just adding GECOS fields and not compliance with age verification IS THE MERGE ITSELF:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/40954
If you genuinely didn't know systemd added the fields for compliance with the two age verification laws (likewise @pid_eins@mastodon.social who boosted your original post), could you PLEASE review the policies here? Because you guys literally added it for age verification law compliance, rejected a PR to remove it because of concerns about age verification compliance, and are now stating publicly you didn't add the field for that reason at all. This suggests a serious breakdown in management and policy making.
Replies (0)
No replies.