Post #2414097
2026-05-07 19:37 UTC
@paul@m.pcgt.link But I learnt that it's definitely very small compared to Graham's number, which is very small compared to
TREE(3)
which is surprising, as
TREE(1) = 1
TREE(2) = 3
But, as my wife said: "why?"
Replies (1)
-
@paul@m.pcgt.link 2026-05-07 20:01
@ligasser@social.epfl.ch Ackermann function with Graham's number as the arguments: https://xkcd.com/207/