Elektrine lite

← Feed

@lastweakness@lemmy.world

Post #2405896

2026-03-27 08:47 UTC

I can't think of a reason to choose Keepass over Vaultwarden.

Replies (4)

  • @john_t@piefed.ee 2026-03-27 11:51

    If you can't selfhost, then you can have your keepass file in your personal cloud. Many basic cloud services are free and the password file itself is encrypted so the cloud provider can't access your passwords.

    Open ##2405898

  • @pulsewidth@lemmy.world 2026-03-27 09:23

    (Edit - I misread as Bitwarden and went off on the wrong tangent. Vaultwarden is not centralized, and it's FOSS - my bad.) ~~The person you're replying to already gave you one: it's free.~~ ~~Second: its not a prime target for attack like centralized, hosted webservices are. See: LastPass being cracked and people's login data stolen.. Twice.~~ ~~Yes, it is cryptographically superior to LastPass, and attempts to design around their flaws - but the threat still exists because its a very tasty target on the open internet for cybercrime.~~ ~~My little Keepass DB synched over personal VPN by Syncthing? Much harder to find a vector for attack. But it does require more moving parts and maintenance.~~ ~~Each have their pros and cons.~~

    Open ##2405899

  • @Mihies@programming.dev 2026-03-27 08:58

    I can.

    Open ##2405900

  • @Telodzrum@lemmy.world 2026-03-27 12:43

    I can’t think of a reason to choose Bit/Vaultwarden over Keepass.

    Open ##2405901