Post #2405388
2026-04-22 09:30 UTC
@andyb@mastodon.au why would you need an OT to replace a smoke detector?? That makes no sense.
Replies (1)
-
@Jestbill@mastodon.world 2026-04-22 13:15
@david_crispin@mstdn.ca @andyb@mastodon.au Seems correct. The original smoke detector likely needed the $400 analysis: a replacement should be included with the first.